Metamik: Should we use both Metamask and Alchemy as a suppliers?
As a web3 creator, you probably know two popular suppliers used to communicate with Ethereum Blockchain: Metamask and Alchemy. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, which can sometimes cause confusion when everyone uses the manufacturing environment. In this article, we will study the differences between the two service providers and if you should really use both.
What is throwing and alchemy?
The metamk is a portfolio based on an open source browser that allows consumers to protect, manage and send ether (ETH) directly to their web browsers. It is for mobile devices, but can also be used using an office browser as a web3 supplier. With Metamask, you can make Ethereum Blockchain, examine your balance and interact with intellectual contracts requires neither software nor additional configuration.
On the other hand, alchemy is another popular supplier that allows consumers to keep the ether in their wallets, control and communicate with the blockchain via a friendly interface. Alchemy offers more sophisticated features than Metamk, such as access to the API, surgery monitoring and the support of several portfolios. It also contains a native Ethereum portfolio called Metamask, which gently integrates into alchemy.
Metamisk and Alchemy: Basic differences
Here are the main differences between the use of the two suppliers in the production environment:
* Interactivity : Metamask is mainly intended to communicate directly with blockchain, while alchemy provides more complex characteristics such as access to API and surgery monitoring.
* Portfolio management : The two suppliers allow you to manage the operations of balance and visualization of your wallet, but the metamask interface is generally clearer. Alchemy has a more sudden learning curve because of its advanced features and its practical interfaces for the user.
* Transactions taxes
: Interaction with blockchain via Metamsk or Alchemy, surgery accusations are deducted from your ether balance. However, when using Alchemy as a web3 supplier directly in your browser, you essentially pay any additional costs for this service.
When to use both metamska and alchemy?
Although it is not necessary to strictly use the two suppliers in the manufacturing environment, there are certain scenarios where the two can be useful:
* Development environment : In the development environment or test projects, metamasque and use of alchemy can help guarantee that your web 3 interaction is fluid and error.
* Inherited support : If you always use an old version of Ethereum Blockchain (for example EIP-1559) and you do not plan to go at any time to a more recent version, it is probably preferable to follow Metamask or alchemy to maintain compatibility;
* Additional characteristics : If you want to fully use more sophisticated alchemy features such as API access or surgery monitoring, both suppliers can be used.
Conclusion
In conclusion, although metamk and alchemy in the manufacturing environment is not necessary, it can provide additional value to the light of your specific use case. If you already know a supplier and want to use their strengths, you don’t need to go to the next one. However, if you are not sure of the supplier to use or needs advanced features, depending on the two options, you can make sure that your web3 interaction is optimized for performance and safety.
The best practice
To reduce potential problems when using metamasque and alchemy:
* Keep your outbuildings at the update : Make sure that metamasque and alchemy have the latest versions to avoid compatibility problems.
* Use the recommended interface : Get to know the official interfaces provided by the two suppliers to ensure a fluid experience.
